翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Wilcze Góry
・ Wilcze Jary
・ Wilbur Wright und seine Flugmaschine (film)
・ Wilbur Wynant House
・ Wilbur Young
・ Wilbur Zelinsky
・ Wilbur, Indiana
・ Wilbur, Oregon
・ Wilbur, Trenton, New Jersey
・ Wilbur, Washington
・ Wilbur, West Virginia
・ Wilbur-by-the-Sea, Florida
・ Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. Kuther
・ Wilburgstetten
・ Wilburn
Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.
・ Wilburn Cartwright
・ Wilburn Chandler Hamilton
・ Wilburn Hill King
・ Wilburn Hollis
・ Wilburn K. Ross
・ Wilburn Snyder
・ Wilburn Township, Ford County, Kansas
・ Wilburn, Alabama
・ Wilburn, Arkansas
・ Wilburt S. Brown
・ Wilburtha, New Jersey
・ Wilburton
・ Wilburton (disambiguation)
・ Wilburton (Link station)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. : ウィキペディア英語版
Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.

''Wilburn Boat Company v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company'', 348 U.S. 310 (1955), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that state law, rather than federal admiralty law, should govern marine insurance contracts.
== Background ==
Appellants J.F. Wilburn, J. H. Wilburn, and L. G. Wilburn and, The Wilburn Boat Company, and Oklahoma based corporation, obtained a marine insurance policy from the Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company for liability coverage for fire among other things, of a vessel called the Wanderer. The Wanderer was moored in an artificial lake called Lake Texoma which bordered the states of Texas and Oklahoma. While moored in Lake Texoma the vessel was completely destroyed by a fire. The Wilburn Boat Company sought recovery for their loss, but Fireman’s Fund denied liability based on The Wilburn Boat Company’s failure to strictly comply with terms of the contract.
Terms of the contract provided under warranties, that without written consent of the insurer the vessel could not be transferred, assigned, hired, or chartered and must be used solely for pleasure purposes. The Wilburn Boat Company had been operating the Wanderer as a commercial carrier, and the vessel had been sold and transferred by the Wilburn's in their personal capacity to the Wilburn Boat Co. Furthermore, the vessel had been pledged as collateral on two occasions; once to Citizen’s National Bank and then to J.F. and J.H. WIlburn, jointly.
The Wilburn Boat Company brought suit in state court admitting to breaching the terms of the contract, but alleging that Texas law governed the terms of the marine insurance contract and as such Fireman’s Fund is still liable (Texas state statute provides that only in the event that the breach is the cause for the subsequent loss may the insured be barred from recovery). The case was removed to federal court under diversity jurisdiction where Fireman’s Fund argued that federal admiralty law governed and as such federal admiralty law requires strict compliance with terms of a marine insurance contract in order to recover on losses.
The Federal District Court found that The Wilburn Boat Company was unable to recover for their loss due to their failure to comply with the specific terms of the contract. The Wilburn Boat Company appealed to the U.S. Fifth District Court of Appeals, which affirmed the lower court decision. The Wilburn Boat company was then granted certiorari.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.